Hi, thanks for your answer. 2013/10/3 Manuel Quiñones <[email protected]>
> What do you want to archive? I don't know Dojo, but acoording to > their website there are independient modules that are AMD-ready, so > you might be able to use them. See our docs: > > > http://developer.sugarlabs.org/activity.md.html#using%20other%20javascript%20libraries I want to make a custom classes hierarchy, with encapsulation in mind (what I am having troubles with in pure javascript), and inheritance. Sorry, I did not know what AMD-ready means. So Dojo is AMD-ready, I think I will go for it. > > > So, is using DojoToolkit safe inside a sugar web activity ? > > Otherwise, I'll look for another javascript POO library. (Prototype.js is > > not fine according to me : too similar to normal javascript). > > You want to archive object oriented programming? You can do it in > straight JavaScript. The Mozilla documentation is nice: > > > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Introduction_to_Object-Oriented_JavaScript > > Thanks, but according to me, using normal Javascript in order to build an OO system is very painfull an ugly. (I come from a Java background). > If you still feel very unconfortable with JS, you could try other > languages that compile to JS. See http://altjs.org/ . Note that this > adds some complexity and the compilation step. Some that I have tried > are CoffeScript (in Gears activity) and TypeScript. And one I'm > looking at lately with attention is ClojureScript. > > No, sorry. I want to make sources reachables by anyone : and I don't sure that a compilation (nor minification, even though we haven't talk about it) deserves this purpose. Regards
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
