On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Weird. There is no tarball but the release has been tagged in git. > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libxklavier/tag/?id=libxklavier-5.4 > > I wonder if they just forgot to upload the tarball...
I've poked to see what the deal is, once we have one I'll push updates into Fedora initially for F-20+ and once it's had some breathing likely for older releases if no gremlins appear. Thanks for that. Peter > On Tuesday, 8 October 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > By the way I think libxklavier 5.4 is not even in Fedora 19 but it's >> > required for the keyboard control panel section to work. >> >> I've just checked this but presumably by 5.4 you mean an unreleased >> version or SVC head because there is no 5.4 released as yet [1] >> >> Peter >> >> [1] http://download.gnome.org/sources/libxklavier/ >> >> > On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> >> >> >> From memory gwebsockets 0.3, libxklavier 5.4, webkitgtk 2.0.x. There >> >> are >> >> almost certainly more deps. (We really need to start tracking our >> >> dependencies more systematically but it's tricky). >> >> >> >> On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Jerry Vonau wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 10:57 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> >>> > It would be nice but I think it would involve a non trivial amount >> >>> > of >> >>> > work to do it properly. It's not just rebuilding the sugar rpms, >> >>> > there >> >>> > are system dependencies that would need to be built... latest >> >>> > libxklavier and webkitgtk comes to my mind, but there is probably >> >>> > more. >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> What versions of the above packages and gwebsockets are required? >> >>> >> >>> Jerry >> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> > On 15 August 2013 05:12, Martin Abente >> >>> > <martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > +1 This would be great! >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard >> >>> > <gonz...@laptop.org> wrote: >> >>> > +1 to have rpms to install over 13.2.0 >> >>> > In this way we can isolate for other changes on the >> >>> > distro, >> >>> > for every change in Fedora version, there are broken >> >>> > pieces, >> >>> > we learned that... >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > Gonzalo >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:48 PM, James Cameron >> >>> > <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: >> >>> > Yes, an image or a procedure for retrofit of >> >>> > 13.2.0 please. >> >>> > >> >>> > I think a retrofit might provide for wider >> >>> > testing. A set of RPMs to >> >>> > download and install, then reboot? >> >>> > >> >>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:28:14PM +0200, >> >>> > Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> >>> > > Being an OLPC list perhaps it's better to >> >>> > wait we have a XO image before >> >>> > > posting there? >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > On 14 August 2013 15:26, Chris Leonard >> >>> > <cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel