On 29/10/2013, at 11:14 AM, David Farning wrote: > As two Data points: > In a private conversation with an Association employee they told me > that they conciser Activity Central a competitor because Activity > Central increased deployments expectations. Their strategy with regard > to Activity Central was to _not_ accept patches upstream with the goal > of causing Activity Central and Dextrose to collapse under its their > weight. As it was private conversation I am not sure how widely spread > the opinion was held.
Interesting. I don't recall hearing this. If it was a serious concern backed by evidence I would have expected to receive a direction on it. I conclude it was speculation and not a formal direction, or it was not communicated to me as a direction. _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel