On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:51:51PM +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > I had proposed to write the web activity stub in C given memory and > startup performance gains. Not everyone was favourable. I think it > would be fine if we can keep it really simple. It's somewhat > worrying that you already run into annoyances with GVariant... Not > many regular Sugar contributors are familiar with C (maybe I'm the > only these days). The risk is that it will become a piece of code no > one is able or wants to hack on.
Indeed. SL #1677 and OLPC #9913, an issue more than four years old now, probably because this C already in Sugar has few maintainers. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
