On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 November 2013 19:21, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Peter, is it possible to get 3.0 in Fedora 19 now that the issue is >> > solved? >> > >> > I've seen the change in git but I don't see an rpm, not even in >> > updates-testing. (Hopefully it's not just me being a bit clueless about >> > Fedora...). >> >> The build failed [1] due to what looks like an introspection issue but >> I've not had time to investigate further. >> > > Looks like libgsf introspection has been enabled only in F20 > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libgsf.git/commit/?h=f20&id=8c2f2ce7975482618ea8c3ec6a3fb0ec43137cb4 > > Any chance of a backport? :)
Possibly, if there's no soname bumps or changes between .26 and .28 > Otherwise I suppose it might make sense to move sugar-build to F20 at this > point, I suppose it's not horribly unstable these days... I hasn't been horribly unstable since around Alpha TBH Peter _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel