On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org> wrote: > I know this topic has been discussed here more than once. > I feel there is a resistance because of a "purity" of design.
I feel there is a resistance because no one has written the patch. (Patches welcome). > However it's a > bit silly that we need to reinvent everything because we have a thing for > simplicity. > For instance I'm doing a workshop with children and I'd have liked to use > "aseprite", a pixel art design program that has everything I need and a > simple interface. Paint activity isn't quite apt for the job. > > So I guess I can contribute to define what I mean: > > 1. Support Freedesktop.Org Icon specification and icon naming conventions > for non-sugar applications, instead of the grey dot in the Frame. > 2. Support Freedesktop.Org Desktop Entry specification for launching > non-sugar applications. Proposal: use ~/.sugar/launchers/ for .desktop > files. These would appear in the Home View, much like Activities do. > > I know we are in Feature Freeze but I only want to propose and discuss the > merits of the feature, so maybe I or others can invest the time required to > achieve this for the next release. > > Regards, > Sebastian > PS: Extra points for sugarizing aseprite, it's really cool: > http://www.aseprite.org/ . Hints and pointers on where to begin are also > welcome. > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel