On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:12:05AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On 04/12/2014 02:07 AM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > Here I just got home. Sorry for the inconvenience I might have caused. > > > > Bernie, do you know which log was/is growing out of hand? > > Both access.log and node.sugarlabs.org.log. I discarded the first and > compressed the second (it compresses very well). You can still examine > it by doing: > > xzless access.log-20140411.xz | tail > > You'll see lines like this one: > > node.sugarlabs.org:80 181.65.159.107 - - [11/Apr/2014:19:51:36 -0400] > "GET /?cmd=subscribe HTTP/1.1" 200 232 "-" "python-requests/1.2.1 > CPython/2.7.0 Linux/2.6.35.13_xo1.5-20120508.1139.olpc.eb0c7a8" > > > The problem seems to be that laptops retry the connection to > /context.atom and /feedback.atom quickly. It's probably near the end of > the file though. Don't try to uncompress the whole file because it's > over 2GB.
`GET /?cmd=subscribe` SN API calls are inteneded to be permanent to provide HTML5 Server-Sent Events. If I'm getting it right, Apache is not assumed to be perfect to support such long-living connections and SN nodes will be switched to direct HTTP access after all. But for now, they are behind Apache porxy with 600 sec proxy timeout, so, logs should not grow too fast. -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
