Would it be bidirectional? (That is, would a reply by mail cause a change in GitHub?)
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:46:41AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > We can make send a email to the mailing list for every event in GitHub. > I would like that, and sugar-devel is low traffic now. > Remember, previously we did all the review process in the mailing list > and that was not a problem. > Anybody think that would be a bad idea? > We can try and if is too much, we can disable it too. > > Gonzalo > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 7:09 PM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > Sugar source code development is hosted on GitHub, which provides > discussion threads on each proposal. > > Non-developers: some features and changes will be in our next version > without any discussion on sugar-devel@ > > To keep track of these off-list discussions, watch the sugarlabs > repositories, in particular the pull requests for repositories such as > sugar: [2]https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pulls > > Or the other components and activities you are interested in: > [3]https://github.com/sugarlabs > > To join a discussion, sign up for a GitHub account. > > There seems to be no way to extend these discussions into sugar-devel@ > in a bidirectional manner. > > -- > James Cameron > [4]http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [5]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > [6]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > -- > Gonzalo Odiard > > SugarLabs - Software for children learning > > References: > > [1] mailto:qu...@laptop.org > [2] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pulls > [3] https://github.com/sugarlabs > [4] http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > [5] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > [6] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel