On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 00:34 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Ouch. > Too bad nobody reported this before.
Ouch, ouch, http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2015-February/002762.html :) Iain > I remember a similar error fixed > by b9d6b628a98fc17f5e92a344450b6336f1a2b2ce > We don't want invest more time in the Gtk.Menu palettes, > but would be great find a fix to ship Sugar in F22 on shape. > > > Gonzalo > > > > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Sam P. <sam.parkins...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Hi All, > > > As per usual, this new Gtk release breaks parts of sugar. > Interestingly it breaks the Gtk.Menu based palette system this > time! (Lucky we were having a design discussion about this a > while ago) > > > So how does it break the Gtk.Menu palettes? > > > * They are now seizure inducing and change size when you move > your mouse. > > * They have lots of extra borders now > > * They always position downwards. Even if that means the > palette will be just 100px tall - they go downwards > > * They don't position correctly to keep the connected look > between the frame buttons and the palette. > > > I have done a quick screen capture that demonstrates all of > these. [1] > > > So I not looked into what would be needed to solve this, > however, do we really want to invest more time in the Gtk.Menu > system? From the previous design discussion ("Palette > Animations" thread), we could just use a modal. I think that > that would be a much more simple solution to implement - but > might not go well with our release cycle. > > > Thanks, > > Sam > > [1] https://vid.me/hfx4 > > > > > > -- > Gonzalo Odiard > > SugarLabs - Software for children learning > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
