On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > > On September 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM Martin Abente > > <martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I rebuilt 0.106.0 packages from fc23 source rpms, for fc22 x86_64. > > So did I using my copr account, what a great tool to build rpms with, > perhaps SL should go back to using it.[1] Easy for testers to enable with > dnf. > > > It works > > fine, so it definitely not something with Sugar. It makes sense since > > nothing changed in SugarExt. > > > > Now, this might be something with fc23, but is it on build time or run > > time? Ideas? Maybe something related to gobject instrospection? > > > > Runtime in F23, otherwise the F23 rpm would not been built. >
Not necessarily, e.g. there could be something wrong happening while generating the gobject introspection files. Something wrong in the sense that the content is not generated "properly", and does not necessarily triggers a "compilation error". In fact, I think this might be the case: I installed the 0.106.0 packages I built for fc22 on a fresh fc23 system and sugar works fine. Ideas? I suspect on the gobject introspection bindings generation, but can't think of what exactly it could be. Refs: [1] http://people.sugarlabs.org/~tch/tests/fedora22/ > Jerry > > > 1. https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/dnarvaez/sugar >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
