I can't imagine the process is so simple. The overwritten translations were probably on translate.sugarlabs.org.

Sugar developers need to determine which Pootle files to install in an image. Each individual Sugar activity has an independent set of translations which needs to be updated into a new version of the Activity.

As Sugar, we need a process to handle this. I strongly believe it is a mistake to do perform localization directly on the Pootle server. It would be better to do the localization at the locale and verify it by use by the native language speakers (primary school children). Update for activities is to submit new po files in an updated version of the acitivity (version += 1). This process is under git version control. These updates, once vetted, can be updated on translate.sugarlabs.org. On a new Sugar release, OLPC or someone determines which activities and which versions of those activities to include in the image.

Tony



On 04/03/2016 11:59 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:

On 2 April 2016 at 23:46, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org <mailto:sebast...@fuentelibre.org>> wrote:

    The translators hired by the Ministry of Education were surprised
    and distressed when they started noticing Edgar was /overwriting
    /the updated translations they were doing.


It seems Pootle is currently configured to encourage such surprise and distress.

It has a 'propose an update' mode ("suggest") and a 'instantly overwrite' mode ("Submit") and today 'submit' is the default action:

http://imgur.com/L2TXdCw

Does anyone know if Pootle can be configured to default to 'suggest', and to use Access Control Lists <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_control_list> to ensure that only trusted translators can approve suggestions, so that such surprise and distress can not happen?


_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Reply via email to