On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
> > On 4 April 2016 at 10:19, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> FWIW, we have had a very hard time keeping hackers out of our trac >> system. Despite extreme measures, SCG still has to manually remove hacked >> accounts. IMHO, it is not worth the effort to maintain. His limited time >> would be much better spent on infrastructure unique to Sugar Labs, such as >> maintaining the customizations we have made to the activity portal. >> > > With Love's email about being confused about where we track out bugs - and > sadly blaming himself! - I would like to revive this topic. > > I guess since it is contentious, it requires a SLOBs vote. > > I'll draft a motion. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> > Date: 20 April 2016 at 08:28 > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Any js related beginner bugs that I can work on > To: sugar-devel <sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org> > > > > On 20 April 2016 at 04:59, Love Mehta <lovemehta...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I was feeling really dumb after not being able to find any bugs I could >> work on. >> > > I'm glad you would speak on this list to say that - another good reason > for shutting down trac and moving the issue tracking to github since the > source code is there :) > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > While SLOB can vote on this, personally I think it is up to the developer community to decide. Can you summarize the recent discussion to date and ask for a thumbs up/down from active developers? regards. -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
