Hi all... I finally had a chance to check out the discussions about the motions I have proposed. Unfortunately I don't really have the chance to do much commenting as I am restricted to communicating with my I phone for a while.
After a great 10 days in WA and going to LinuxFestNW (on our own dime), we got home and Ed started having dizzy spells. After a lot of testing, it has been decided that the time to get a pacemaker has come. So, if all goes according to plan, it will be implanted this evening and he will get to go home about 24 hours later. That means I will miss tomorrow's meeting. If I need to add anything to the motion or discussion before it comes up for vote... Send an email to this thread. Caryl Sent from my iPhone > On May 3, 2016, at 6:44 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > > >> On 3 May 2016 at 09:37, Caryl Bigenho <cbige...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Why does the vision statement say "but not phones"? I run Sugarizer on my >> iPhone and Ed's Android phone. There are some formatting issues but they are >> easily overcome. In the real world of developing countries, children are >> probably more likely to have access to one of these tiny screens than any >> tablet or computer. They deserve access to Sugar too. > > I added that because when I tested it seemed to not work well, but I don't > object to removing it and have just done so :) > > https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Vision_proposal_2016&diff=98338&oldid=98337
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
