I think motion A could be simplified:
The Finance Manager shall be appointed by a majority vote of the Sugar
Labs Oversight Board and may be either anon-voting officer or one of the
current Oversight Board members. The Finance Manager will serve at the
will of the Board and may be removed and replaced by a majority vote of
the Board if necessary.
to
The Oversight Board shall appoint a member of Sugar Labs to serve in the
office of _Finance Manager_ at the will of the Board.
The last two paragraphs can be deleted. The last paragraph is redundant
given the Finance Manager serves at the will of the Board. The
paragraph regarding remuneration is unnecessary since the Board can
clearly make decisions about remuneration as needed (which is basically
wha the paragraph says).
I think Motion B is unnecessary. The procedure with regard to the
Conservancy is already defined (and apparently not under our control).
Add to Motion A: duties:
3. The Finance Manager is authorized to approve expenditures up to $100
Requests for expenditures will be presented to the Board by the
Finance Manager for approval.
Most of the rest is implicit in Motion A duties item 1.
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
