El 26/07/16 a las 18:16, Dave Crossland escribió: > > User facing features are at the application level. How they are > implemented is only a detail. I'd rather have a paint app that > collaborates, no matter how it is built. Currently we have none. > > The technology that Sugar platform offers to activity developers is > what determines if they implement collaboration as a user facing > feature. It seems to me that the current platform recommendation is > for something that was experimental 10 years ago and has not matured > in this time, so I am not surprised to hear central apps like paint > don't implement features with it. >
At the time perhaps a decision was required because the "platform" needed to fit into 1GB of the XO1 nand flash. In this case (because we are discussing Sugar/GTK), the "platform" is all of GNU/Linux. Perhaps the "official" recommendation should stay at the design / UI / philosophical level. After all, as you say, Sugarizer uses something different (that is...?). > > > It is part of our philosophy to promote collaboration - at all > levels - open organizations, user freedom, git, wiki, etc. > > Right - so I think its worth considering the strategic context of the > implementation details: ) > Only if you are planning on implementing (and maintaining!) "it"... _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel