But that's pretty much what it says; you must have missed it on the page. For Sugar, "Send us a link to a pull request or merge request you have made on a Sugar or Sugar activity bug."
And for Sugarizer "Using instructions here develop your first Sugar-Web activity Send us a screenshot of your new activity executed in Sugarizer". On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 09:46:50AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote: > Agreed. > > Personally, I would like to see a candidate invited to create, > enhance, or document an activity. At one point there was an effort > to provide a toolbar help button but, for some reason, that seems to > have faded. > > Tony > > On 04/26/2017 09:38 AM, James Cameron wrote: > >No, the requirement isn't mandatory; there's alternative requirements, > >see > >https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/Template#Miscellaneous > > > >Also, we've since greatly simplified "development environment" to > >include native packaged Sugar, which is not a substitute. > > > >On the other hand, candidates need to prove their capability somehow; > >sugar-build was once a useful substitute for examinations, and if they > >are going to contribute to Sugar through code development it was a good > >challenge. > > > >However, our previous candidates are having a lot of problems figuring > >out how to fix sugar-build, and this makes; > > > >- the native packaged Sugar environment; and, > > > >- the alternative requirements (pull requests or Sugarizer), > > > >much more useful than before. > > > >In the end, this is up to Walter as responsible contact. > > > >On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 06:50:59AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote: > >>Yeah! > >> > >>Now if we could only get the GSOC invitations to stop requiring candidates > >>to > >>build a 'development environment' and ask them to use Sugar., not a sugar > >>substitute. > >> > >>Tony > >> > >>On 04/26/2017 04:44 AM, James Cameron wrote: > >> > >> [1]@iamutkarshtiwari, certainly not. Fix sugar-build, not sugar. > >> sugar-build is only an emulator, and is not used very much at all. > >> sugar is > >> used by the most people. > >> > >> — > >> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > >> Reply to this email directly, [2]view it on GitHub, or [3]mute the > >> thread.* > >> > >>References: > >> > >>[1] https://github.com/iamutkarshtiwari > >>[2] > >>https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/issues/49#issuecomment-297159303 > >>[3] > >>https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAULkt75KJJrcz9o3og71gcYeOqzV92Iks5rzltEgaJpZM4MmBhE > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Sugar-devel mailing list > >>[email protected] > >>http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
