On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 02:14:51PM +0000, D. Joe wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 04:04:05PM +1000, James Cameron wrote: > > No doubt about relevance, but conflicting opinion may reinforce > > errant behaviour rather than improve a situation. The rebound > > effect. > > > > I have seen no other interest than what you have expressed. > > Speaking as a relative newcomer to the community, I find this > interesting.
Thanks! It is good to see interest. Please get involved. Let me rephrase my earlier brevity; I've seen no other interest from the board members other than Laura. I'm expecting they are too busy or my mail is filed as spam. ;-} > [...] > One model for group decision making that I do like, that seems to > work reasonably well without nearly so much overhead as traditional > debate-centered deliberations is the consent agenda mechanism. > [...] Yes, this is a good one. Thanks for sharing it. It may highlight an underlying limitation; the time the board members have available to contribute toward deliberation. -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel