Thanks Chris to point it. I'm very interested by a way to improve L10n of Sugarizer. Specifically because the next version will include a tutorial so lot of new strings. It will be great to use Pootle to help translation.
BTW as you know Sugarizer use the "native" file format of web10ln.js [1] for translation: .ini files. See for example [2]. Do you think there is way to convert .ini files to Pootle then from Pootle to .ini files ? Will be happy to help on this. Best regards from France. Lionel. [1] https://github.com/fabi1cazenave/webL10n [2] https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/blob/dev/locale.ini > On May 18, 2017 11:21 PM, "Chris Leonard" <cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Have any of our Javasript / Sugarizer folks played around with > > xgettext-js yet? > > > > https://www.npmjs.com/package/xgettext-js > > > > If it helps us improve the L10n of Sugarizer via leveraging Pootle > > hosting or even just all of the hopefully similar strings already > > completed for corresponding Python versions of Activities in Pootle, > > it would possibly be a big win. > > > > cjl > > _______________________________________________ > > Sugar-devel mailing list > > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel