I noticed that my PR review and merged by Ignacio, but it later was reverted by Sebastian again. Looks like if I send another PR, this will keep happening, and i just want to point out that this is VERY scary, having one person unilaterally making these decisions.
This is wrong. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Martin Abente < [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Sean DALY <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In the past, OLPC was amenable to the use of the xo logo in Sugar, but >> asked we not use it in marketing materials without a formal co-branding >> licensing agreement. [1,2] >> >> The proposed feet logo is likely a violation of the GNOME Foundation >> trademark, more info on their site [3]. >> > > If the feet logo could be a violation of the GNOME trademark, then lets > revert it, until a proper replacement is found (and if its really needed, > of course). > > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-artwork/pull/97 > > >> >> Sean. >> >> 1. http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2008-December/003059.html >> 2. http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2011-October/014245.html >> 3. https://wiki.gnome.org/action/show/FoundationBoard/Resources >> /LicensingGuidelines?action=show&redirect=Foundation%2FLic >> ensingGuidelines >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Walter Bender <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Laura Vargas <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Am attaching the previous brand icon Trademark just for reference. >>>> >>> >>> The question is more complex than whether or not OLPC received a >>> trademark. Was it ever applicable to our use in Sugar? Is it still valid? >>> Note that "a failure to enforce a trademark by monitoring the mark for >>> misuses will result in a weakening of the mark and loss of distinctiveness, >>> which can lead to a loss of the trademark." [1] Sugar Labs has been using >>> xo-computer.svg and has never, as far as I know, received any notification >>> that we are infringing. I don't know the answers to these questions, which >>> is why I asked that our lawyer look into it. >>> >>> [1] https://www.justia.com/intellectual-property/trademarks/enforcement/ >>> >>> regards. >>> >>> -walter >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2017-09-13 13:16 GMT-05:00 Laura Vargas <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>> >>>>> Yes Sugar user interface needed to urgently get rid of any Trademark >>>>> at all. We can breath now :D >>>>> >>>>> If you don't like the feet feel free to propose a new option or a >>>>> dynamic for our Community to accomplish a new one collaboratively. I >>>>> really like the cute little finger color's. >>>>> >>>>> See how it looks here: >>>>> >>>>> http://laboratoriosazucar.org/azucarizador/ >>>>> >>>>> There is still an urgent need for 111.1 Sugar release including this >>>>> change. >>>>> >>>>> Am not sure whether or not Sugar Labs has currently a release Manager. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe if we propose a "Christmas Edition" for 111.1 I'll get to >>>>> inspire some heroes to help us out. >>>>> >>>>> It would be ideal, if we can also add some other critical features >>>>> required like the elimination of the male/female initial question. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Laura >>>>> >>>>> 2017-09-13 12:06 GMT-05:00 Alex Perez <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> On this subject, I may have missed this, but where did the (IMHO >>>>>> awful) "feet" icon come from, who approved its use, and was the board >>>>>> involved with the decision? It seems a fairly central branding decision. >>>>>> >>>>>> Walter Bender <[email protected]> >>>>>> Wednesday, September 13, 2017 5:49 AM >>>>>> Regarding https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-artwork/pull/96 it >>>>>> would be helpful to get Tony's feedback. Can you please contact him as >>>>>> our >>>>>> liaison to the SFC? >>>>>> >>>>>> regards. >>>>>> >>>>>> -walter >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Walter Bender >>>>>> Sugar Labs >>>>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Laura V. >>>>> * I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org* >>>>> >>>>> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.” >>>>> ~ L. Victoria >>>>> >>>>> Happy Learning! >>>>> #LearningByDoing >>>>> #Projects4good >>>>> #IDesignATSugarLabs >>>>> #WeCanDoBetter >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Laura V. >>>> * I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org* >>>> >>>> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.” >>>> ~ L. Victoria >>>> >>>> Happy Learning! >>>> #LearningByDoing >>>> #Projects4good >>>> #IDesignATSugarLabs >>>> #WeCanDoBetter >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Walter Bender >>> Sugar Labs >>> http://www.sugarlabs.org >>> <http://www.sugarlabs.org> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
