Hi Walter and Lionel, Lionel Laské <lionel.la...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2. Do you have a plan for reconciling the licensing issue [2]? > The issue is marked as Wont Fix, but I don't think that is > adequate. In addition, there has been a lot of unilateral > re-licensing of GPL and AGPL content to Apache. This is not OK. > We could ask the SFC for their advice as to how to proceed. I think it's fine to ask SFC advice, but we should list issues first. Porting a software to another language/framework is not reusing code, so Lionel's answer seems fine to me in issues #48[1]. But if some content has been published under GPLv2(+) or GPLv3(+) then relicensed under Apache 2.0, that's probably a mistake and we certainly should fix it. I'm willing to help in this area. [1] https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/issues/48 -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel