On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:21 PM Lionel Laské <lionel.la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Alex, > > Le mar. 27 nov. 2018 à 18:27, Alex Perez <ape...@alexperez.com> a écrit : > >> Lionel, >> >> Thank you for stepping forward. I encourage others to ask questions of >> you as well. I have a few: >> >> Sure, you're welcome. > > >> Are you willing to state that you will make your best effort to attend >> all SLOB meetings? There is no statement to this effect on your candidacy >> page, and as you are no doubt aware, I have called out a number of current >> SLOB members out regarding their extremely poor attendance. >> >> Few things about that. > Thanks for the count you've done about attendance for each SLOB member. I > respect your work however I must say you're wrong on me at least for the > last meeting. I was there as you could see on the log. BTW the question is > not about meeting attendance but more about meeting content. I must say > that we spent in 2 previous years lot of time and energy to talk and debate > about travel reimbursement for some members. These debates discouraged lot > of SLOB members and it's probably the reason some of them decided to not > candidate again. I must confess I was questioning myself too: your own > candidacy was one reason to motivate me that something could be changed > (please James, join us too ;-). > Finally, I'm not sure anyone could have doubt about my personal engagement > in SugarLabs during past years. > > >> Also, on your candidacy page, you state "We are an open source community. >> It should be asserted on our webpage and we must choose tools compatible >> with that philosophy. It's not acceptable for example that today the >> SugarLabs webpage include multiple tracking tools." >> >> Can you be more specific about what sort of tracking tools you believe >> are problematic? I personally agree that the Sugar Labs website needs to do >> a better job explaining what the project is, and that it is an open source >> project (these words to not appear anywhere on the Sugar Labs landing page). >> >> I think specifically to Google Analytics. But as you said the main point > is that words Open Source should appears clearly. > I believe in improvement and how to make a community better. As a member of Sugar Labs, have you considered opening an issue on the www-sugarlabs to bring in a better alternative? Ignoring things, as a community member when have a better solution for "me" isn't a good way to grow a community. (My opinion) > > Regards, >> Alex Perez >> >> > Lionel Laské <lionel.la...@gmail.com> >> November 27, 2018 at 9:02 AM >> Hi all, >> >> I'm proud to be candidate for the SugarLabs Oversight Board election. >> >> Find more about my candidacy here: >> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2018-2020-candidates/Lionel_Lask%C3%A9 >> >> Best regards from France. >> >> Lionel. >> >> >> -- Samson Goddy Twitter: https://twitter.com/samson_goddy Email: samsongo...@sugarlabs.org samsongo...@gmail.com Website: https://samsongoddy.me/ <https://www.sugarlabs.org/>
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel