Hi Jake, Didn't know Talkify but Talkify seems to rely on a backend. Because not all our users have access to Internet (or even to a server), my preference is to use JavaScript libraries that could work offline. It's why Speak is better thought its quality is worse than Talkify.
Regards. Lionel. Le sam. 6 avr. 2019 à 10:48, <sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org> a écrit : > > Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 12:34:56 +0530 > From: Jake Scarlet <mmatt...@gmail.com> > To: James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> > Cc: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project > Message-ID: > < > calj6_ukt-ot7r4qnm6u_ldoitx-gfdjr9t0yh7j89qv0gzv...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I tested the API from Speak activity. It's fine but I personally found > https://github.com/Hagsten/Talkify to be a better option. I could also > tweak the voice a bit to make it sound like Alice from the Python version > of write, I've looked into the licencing and all. > So should I use this or the one in Speak activity? > > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 04:33, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > Look for any APIs used now in Sugarizer for text to speech, and use > > the same? > > > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:59:50AM +1400, Jake Scarlet wrote: > > > Ah yes James, that's exactly what I meant to ask. Thank you all for > your > > > feedback. > > > The project idea mentions that We can use an existing API based text > > editor for > > > the base. I've decided to go with QuillJS (one of the mentioned > options), > > > mainly for the flexibility and the fact that It can be optimized to > > such great > > > extent. Since it isn't confined inside an iframe like many other legacy > > > editors that i came across, I can tailor it to perfectly match the > > Sugarizer > > > environment.Also, the lack of any dependencies makes up for a lot of > > > simplicity. > > > I've tested the basic functionalities and they all match up to the > > original > > > python version of the Write application. > > > > > > Should I proceed with this? > > > And also, what API would you recommend for the text to speech feature, > > referred > > > to as Alice in the python version? > > > > -- > > James Cameron > > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Sugar-devel mailing list > > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > ---- >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel