On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 08:09:00PM +0530, Rahul Bothra wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:48 AM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > I'm also not sure how else the activity sources have diverged. > > As long as we can achieve the same user experience, I'd recommend > that we ignore comparing changes made in each of the sources. There > are better things that a developer's time could go into.
True, but without some cursorary comparison we wouldn't know if we dropped a feature or bug fix. > With that said, the best way to ensure we don't skip any portion of > the experience is to check the source history ;-) Unfortunately, some of these sources don't have a commit history. So comparison could be; - convert line endings, - autoformatting, (only for the purposes of comparison, as divergence in code format or style is a really useful indicator of change or mixed authorship), - recursive diff(1) or visualisation tools like meld. -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
