Hello, Sorry for being away for some time from this topic as I was working on an activity for sugarizer . Now I have the time to dedicate to this task.
I am still not able to get a crystal clear image of the task. As originally I proposed an activity for sugarizer and James suggested that I would be great if the activity could work on both sugar and sugarizer which is actually really good. I have two understanding of this task. First one : Sugar-web repository of sugar labs is outdated and need to to update to the level of sugar-web of sugarizer . OR Is it to update the sugar-web of sugarizer to make it compatible with both sugar and sugarizer Firstly, I can find two sugar-web repositories one of sugar labs ( https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web) and one of sugarizer( https://github.com/llaske/sugar-web) . What I understand is to bring the sugar web repository of sugar labs to the save level as that of sugarizer . Am I correct? Secondly, here https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/blob/master/src/web-activity.md to run the basic activity of sugarizer on sugar (ubuntu) it is using sugar-web of sugarizer ,which I think should not be the case . We should be running it by updating the sugar-web of sugarlabs repository if I am not mistaken. Lastly, what would be the basis to update the sugar-web of sugar labs I mean what would be the basis of test? Thank You On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:30 PM <sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org> wrote: > Send Sugar-devel mailing list submissions to > sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sugar-devel-ow...@lists.sugarlabs.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Sugar-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: New Activity Proposal (Lionel Laské) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 17:46:44 +0200 > From: Lionel Laské <lionel.la...@gmail.com> > To: Sugar-dev Devel <sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org> > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] New Activity Proposal > Message-ID: > <CAA0v29AUnOX04HME306toqvZ-u4nEd4_PfEaYgBLcCrj= > fs...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Just few elements to give you some context. > > Sugarizer was designed initially to host Sugar activities written with > Sugar-Web. A brief history of Sugarizer is here: > https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/blob/dev/docs/credits.md > So the Sugar-Web implementation in Sugarizer was compatible with Sugar. > It's why today, the activity template to write a new Sugarizer activity ( > https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/tree/dev/activities/ActivityTemplate) > use in Sugarizer Development Tutorial, still include Python stuff. > Just zip the content of your Sugarizer activities into a .xo file (explain > here: > > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/blob/master/src/web-activity.md#ready-to-release > ) > and you should be able to install it on Sugar and run it. At least, > theoretically. > > Unfortunately the compatibility between Sugarizer and Sugar-Web was lost > during the development of Sugarizer. The Sugar-Web implementation in > Sugarizer was never merged in Sugar-Web, Sugarizer added new features > (presence, Journal chooser, ...) not directly compatible with Sugar and no > one worked to maintain the compatibility. > > BTW it will be interesting to retrieve this compatibility, even if some > features are not directly mappable, at least to allow a Sugarizer activity > to be launched on Sugar and run basic features of the activity. > > It's not necessary a very complex task but it require rigor and patience. > The thread here: https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web/pull/133 explain > the process if you're volunteer to work on this task. Of course, both > people from the Sugar side and from the Sugarizer side on this list will be > able to help you. > > Regards. > > Lionel. > > > > Le mar. 7 avr. 2020 à 15:56, <sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org> a > écrit : > > > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 13:14:28 +0530 > > From: Abhishek Tanwar <abhishektanwar...@gmail.com> > > To: James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> > > Cc: Sugar-dev Devel <sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org> > > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] New Activity Proposal > > Message-ID: > > < > > calhjuuh2vowxmwb4nmn9r8fuwofaassksuzfm22zge6kxha...@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > Thanks for the clarification James. > > What I am not able to understand is that if I make an activity by > following > > this https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/blob/master/docs/tutorial.md , > > how > > will the activity work in both sugarizer as well as in sugar . > > I have developed activities for sugarizer earlier and have decent > > experience in it but I am not sure if I am correctly understanding what > you > > are looking for. > > I have gone through the discussions in > > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web/issues/127 and > > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web/pull/133 . Sugarizer activities > use > > the sugar-web library , I can't find the relevant documentation for > > developing activities for both sugar and sugarizer, if you could help me > > with some documentation that would be great. > > > > Maybe I am not understanding what you intend to tell. Please let me know > > what direction to head in. > > > > Thank You > > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:42 AM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > > > Yes. Sugar is a Linux environment that can run any language. > > > Sugarizer is a JavaScript environment inside browser. An activity can > > > be written to run in both Sugar and Sugarizer. The Sugar Web library > > > facilitates that. You will have seen the post here earlier about work > > > on Sugar Web. > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 03:19:00AM +0530, Abhishek Tanwar wrote: > > > > Hello , > > > > I did not quite understand everything . > > > > By saying "include sugar as a platform for sugarizer activity" I did > > not > > > > understand what you are trying to say . > > > > Are you saying to make mancala for both sugar and sugarizer? > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > On Tue, 7 Apr, 2020, 3:10 am James Cameron, <[1]qu...@laptop.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > We have a Sugar activity for Mancala, written in Python. > > > > > > > > [2]https://github.com/sugarlabs/mancala-activity > > > > > > > > License is GPLv3+, but Peter Hewitt has delegated an authority to > > me > > > > to relicense his activities as we require. Sugarizer activities > > use > > > a > > > > different license in order to maximise distribution. > > > > > > > > Please do include Sugar as a platform for your JavaScript > activity. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 02:11:21AM +0530, Abhishek Tanwar wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > I have been searching for games that could help the children to > > > develop > > > > their > > > > > brains and work in teams as well to incorporate the values of a > > > good team > > > > > player. > > > > > > > > > > Mancala(or Mangala) is one such game that I came > > > across. [1]https:// > > > > > [3]en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mancala > > > > > [2][4]https://mancala.playdrift.com/ > > > > > Mancala on sugarizer can be played between computer vs player , > > > player vs > > > > > player (offline ),player vs player (online using presence). > > > > > I think this could be a good addition to sugarizer for children > > of > > > age 6 > > > > and > > > > > above. > > > > > I want to make this game for sugarizer and would like the > > > community to > > > > share > > > > > feedback on this if it would be good addition. > > > > > > > > > > Thank You > > > > > > > > > > References: > > > > > > > > > > [1] [5]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mancala > > > > > [2] [6]https://mancala.playdrift.com/ > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Sugar-devel mailing list > > > > > [7]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > > > > [8]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > > > > > -- > > > > James Cameron > > > > [9]http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > > > > > > > References: > > > > > > > > [1] mailto:qu...@laptop.org > > > > [2] https://github.com/sugarlabs/mancala-activity > > > > [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mancala > > > > [4] https://mancala.playdrift.com/ > > > > [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mancala > > > > [6] https://mancala.playdrift.com/ > > > > [7] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > > > [8] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > [9] http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > > > > > -- > > > James Cameron > > > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20200407/36d472d2/attachment-0001.htm > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 138, Issue 8 > ******************************************* >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel