On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think a better angle on the problem is to be more aggressive about > blocking email. Can we GPG sign email by default? I hope you weren't serious about GPG either. ;-) I suppose people can tolerate a wee bit o' garbage at the end of their messages, if for whatever reason they don't have access to GPG (e.g. I don't get this list in my GPG-capable MUA, but use the web interface -- and don't particularly like FireGPG). But do you want people to type a password on every send? If not, aren't you kind of defeating the whole point of GPG, or am I misunderstanding you? -- Kevin Cole | Key ID: 0xE6F332C7 (GPG/PGP) Gallaudet University | WWW: http://gri.gallaudet.edu/~kjcole/ Hall Memorial Bldg S-419 | V/TTY: (202) 651-5135 Washington, D.C. 20002-3695 | FAX: (202) 651-5746 ". ! 1 |" -- Rene Magritte's computer _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar