On 14.05.2008, at 11:22, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > does this mean that the full-time Sugar team should stop > maintaining any activities and focus on the "core"? I would love to do > so, but I'm afraid that Sugar won't reach its goals if we don't make > sure that some very basic activities keep growing.
I am not disagreeing with that (although we may have different ideas of "very basic"). Perhaps what I am unclear on is what this proposal of activity inclusion in Sugar is about. Are you implying above that this is the set of activities maintained by full-time Sugar team members? Otherwise, why do you bring that into the discussion? Or, more concretely, should Etoys be considered? I don't think so, but that's more on a hunch than by arguments, it would meet the criteria listed. What exactly does it mean to be a "basic activity", for its developers, for deployment, for support, etc.? - Bert - _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar