I would argue otherwise. Since Sugar has no control over the robustness of the network, having some way of sharing at a basic level from the Journal is seemingly a high priority. Half of the high-priority bugs in the link you provide are in fact not really Sugar bugs, but subsystem bugs. The others don't seem to be particularly pressing.
-walter On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tomeu, > >> have heard occasional requests to implement the sending and sharing of >> journal entries. > > It's a desirable feature but, from my perspective, it's much lower in > immediate priority than work which brings the sugar UI revision into a > releasable condition and which "polish" the existing work by closing > several of the 379 tickets assigned to component 'sugar': > > > http://dev.laptop.org/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&component=sugar&order=priority&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&col=component > >> So the questions are: is this a feature we should deliver for the 8.2 >> release? > > In my opinion, "no". > > Do you think differently? > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
