On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 09:36, Morgan Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure if this has been reported to the Sugar team...
>
> Morgan

Logged as http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7456

>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 00:45
> Subject: [Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#489817: sugar-toolkit: gsm_xsmp_init
> implicitly converted to pointer
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Package: sugar-toolkit
> Version: 0.81.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Usertags: implicit-pointer-conversion
>
> Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that is likely to
> cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a
> pointer is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and amd64.
>
>  Function `gsm_xsmp_init' implicitly converted to pointer at _sugarext.c:896
>  Function `gsm_xsmp_init' implicitly converted to pointer at _sugarext.c:896
>
> This is often due to a missing function prototype definition.
> For more information, see [2].
>
> Though it is guaranteed that this codepath will cause a segfault on certain
> architectures, it is not guaranteed that this codepath would ever be executed
> (e.g., if the returned pointer is never dereferenced). However, this bug
> does prevent the ia64 buildd from successfully building this package, 
> resulting
> in a practical FTBFS issue and warranting the serious severity.
>
> [1] http://people.debian.org/~dannf/check-implicit-pointer-functions
> [2] http://wiki.debian.org/ImplicitPointerConversions
>
> --
> dann frazier
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-olpc-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-olpc-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Reply via email to