As of this summer, "all of the code contained in our Squeak Etoys version 4.0 is covered by either the Apache 2.0 or MIT Licenses."
-walter On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:04 PM, David Van Assche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wasnt aware squeak was a firmware binary or a font... > > No but seriously, that passage talks about just fonts.. not software > that uses wrongly licensed components, which is what squeak is > > David > > On 11/6/08, Luke Faraone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 20:18, David Van Assche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > The problem here is that edubuntu and its packages are in Ubuntu Main, >> > and for sugar to be in there, there must be no non-free software in >> > it, and squeak is not totally free. Apple fonts not being modifiable, >> > iirc. Its pretty much the same policy as debian. >> >> This does not seem to be the case, according to >> http://www.ubuntu.com/community/ubuntustory/components >> : >> >> >> "The licences for software applications in main must be free, but main may >> also may contain binary firmware and selected fonts that cannot be modified >> without permission from their authors. In all cases redistribution is >> unencumbered." >> >> -lf >> >> > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar