On Dec 5, 2008, at 12:09 AM, Martin Dengler wrote: > Because it's hard to distinguish gratuitous/personal attacks from a > tough-love
I gave a concrete suggestion about a particular use case (XO/XS authentication) -- namely, to stay the hell away from a hard dependency on a stack that's been, without any doubt or question, extremely problematic to get to work even for its very basic purpose. I don't see how this is either gratuitous or personal. > I would love to see the reponse if someone from sugarlabs were to send > an email saying "Bitfrost has a long, colourful history of being > fucking ineffective and its implementation has a number of holes You're confusing Bitfrost and Rainbow. I spent almost no time on the latter, and not by choice; how my time was allocated for a good chunk of my OLPC tenure agitated me greatly and was no small element in my decision to depart, which is entirely off-topic for the present discussion. -- Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://radian.org _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
