Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 15:20 -0400 schrieb Steve Huff: > On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Christoph Maser wrote: > > > As I am for a much more strict policy at rpmforge I vote for a complete > > removal of perl-XML-LibXMl and perl-XML-LibXSLT or at most provide an > > old version for perl-XML-LibXSLT wich works with the perl-XML-LibXML > > version from base. It is much better to not have a particular piece then > > to have a broken version. > > > Chris, > > i did some digging into this (see SVN r8817), and we need at the very minimum: > > perl-XML-LibXML <= 1.69 > perl-XML-LibXML-Common (bring it back from the vault) > perl-XML-LibXSLT <= 1.63 > > and we need Dag to remove any later versions from the repo. > > if we want to roll all the way back to the versions from upstream, we > have to go back to perl-XML-LibXSLT <= 1.59 (there's already a spec > for this in SVN). for packages that are as widely used as these, i'm > OK with offering versions that replace packages from upstream, since > their absence is really crippling. > > -shuff >
Well as I said I am for a very strict policy. I would rather start over and never ever package anything which is in base after the lessons learned so far. >From what i see in the buildlogs/repo there never was perl-XML-LibXML available from rpmforge before the version 1.70 and the only version for perl-XML-LibXSLT is 1.59. So remove perl-XML-LibXM do nothing with perl-XML-LibXML-Common (the packages are available) and we're done. _______________________________________________ suggest mailing list suggest@lists.rpmforge.net http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest
