Hello,

I'm trying to generate elevation data from OSM using:

    netconvert --osm.elevation --osm.layer-elevation 6.0 ...

My understanding is that this should put OSM nodes and ways without a
"layer" attribute on ground level, those with "layer=1" at 6m elevation,
etc. But I'm observing some results that I can't make sense. Some ways are
elevated or, worse, placed underground.

For example, way 538879518 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538879518> has
no layer attribute. Its constituent nodes are 34710075
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/34710075>, 406186415
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/406186415> and 5215366122
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5215366122>, none of which have a layer
attribute set.

When I run this through netconvert, it splits this way into two edges whose
lanes have heights ranging from -1.91m to -5.01m:

    <edge id="538879514#0" from="34710075" to="406069108" name="Queens Quay
West" priority="7" type="highway.secondary">
        <lane id="538879514#0_0" index="0" disallow="tram rail_urban rail
rail_electric pedestrian ship" speed="11.11" length="3.57"
shape="1007.90,351.67,-1.91 1006.33,350.86,-5.01">
            <param key="origId" value="538879514"/>
        </lane>
    </edge>
    <edge id="538879514#1" from="406069108" to="5215360015" name="Queens
Quay West" priority="7" type="highway.secondary">
        <lane id="538879514#1_0" index="0" disallow="tram rail_urban rail
rail_electric pedestrian ship" speed="11.11" length="10.74"
shape="1001.54,348.65,-5.01 991.57,344.67,-4.98">
            <param key="origId" value="538879514"/>
        </lane>
    </edge>

I would have expected this way to be at ground level.

What's going on here? Why is this (surface level) way being placed below
ground? Is this a bug? Is there a workaround?

Thanks!
  - Dan
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Reply via email to