It was related and should be fixed now. This just goes to show that the cmake-build does harder checks compared to the autotools build I'm still using.
2018-06-11 10:27 GMT+02:00 Lara CODECA <lara.cod...@eurecom.fr>: > Thank you for the bug-fix! > > I'm trying to recompile it now (cmake, debian unstable), and I have this > error: > > [ 83%] Swig source > /home/drone/Applications/SUMO/sumo-git/sumo/src/libsumo/TraCIDefs.h:96: > Warning 312: Nested union > not currently supported (ignored). [ 83%] Built target > gen_libsumo_libsumoPYTHON_wrap > Scanning dependencies of target _libsumo > [ 83%] Building CXX object src/libsumo/CMakeFiles/_libsumo.dir/python/ > libsumoPYTHON_wrap.cxx.o > In file included > from /home/drone/Applications/SUMO/sumo-git/sumo/build/cmake- > build/src/libsumo/python/libsumoPYTHON_wrap.cxx:5318:0: > /home/drone/Applications/SUMO/sumo-git/sumo/src/libsumo/Vehicle.h:192:33: > error: ‘SUMOVehicle’ does not name a type; did you mean ‘MSVehicle’? > static bool isVisible(const > SUMOVehicle* veh); ^~~~~~~~~~~ > MSVehicle > src/libsumo/CMakeFiles/_libsumo.dir/build.make:62: recipe for target > 'src/libsumo/CMakeFiles/_libsumo.dir/python/libsumoPYTHON_wrap.cxx.o' > failed make[2]: *** > [src/libsumo/CMakeFiles/_libsumo.dir/python/libsumoPYTHON_wrap.cxx.o] > Error 1 > CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1362: recipe for target > 'src/libsumo/CMakeFiles/_libsumo.dir/all' > failed > make[1]: *** [src/libsumo/CMakeFiles/_libsumo.dir/all] Error 2 > Makefile:129: recipe for target > 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 > > I'm fairly sure it's not related with this fix, but I decided to report it > anyway.. > > Cheers, > Lara > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 09:09:54 +0200 > Jakob Erdmann <namdre.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you for reporting this bug (now fixed). > > https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/4199 > > regards, > > Jakob > > > > 2018-06-10 15:06 GMT+02:00 Lara CODECA <lara.cod...@eurecom.fr>: > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > I have some strange simulation results.. My sim starts at time 18000.00 > > > and I need to use TraCI to > > > retrieve some information. > > > > > > In the summary, the first timestamp has meanWaitingTime="18000.00". > > > <step time="18000.00" loaded="4" inserted="1" running="1" waiting="0" > > > ended="0" > > > meanWaitingTime="18000.00" meanTravelTime="-1.00" halting="1" > > > meanSpeed="0.00" > > > meanSpeedRelative="0.00" duration="1528567719873"/> > > > > > > The route file contains (among others): > > > <person id="pedestrian_1_3456" depart="18002"> > > > <ride from="15583#1" to="15419#1" > lines="pedestrian_1_3456_tr"/> > > > </person> > > > <vehicle id="pedestrian_1_3456_tr" type="bicycle" depart="triggered"> > > > <route edges="15583#1 15583#2 15583#3 15174 15416 15417#1 > 15417#2 > > > 15593#0 > > > 15593#1 15593#2 -15280 -15945#1 15418 15419#0 15419#1"/> > > > </vehicle> > > > > > > In the tripinfo, I can see: > > > <personinfo id="pedestrian_1_3456" depart="18002.00"> > > > <ride waitingTime="0.00" vehicle="pedestrian_1_3456_tr" > > > depart="18002.00" > > > arrival="18147.00" arrivalPos="21.14" duration="145.00" > > > routeLength="762.43"/> > > > </personinfo> > > > <tripinfo id="pedestrian_1_3456_tr" depart="18002.00" > > > departLane="15583#1_1" departPos="1.70" > > > departPosLat="0.00" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="18002.00" > > > arrival="18147.00" > > > arrivalLane="15419#1_1" arrivalPos="21.14" arrivalPosLat="-1.02" > > > arrivalSpeed="5.52" > > > duration="145.00" routeLength="761.58" waitingTime="0.00" > waitingCount="0" > > > stopTime="0.00" > > > timeLoss="7.08" rerouteNo="0" devices="vehroute_pedestrian_1_3456_tr > > > tripinfo_pedestrian_1_3456_tr > > > fcd_pedestrian_1_3456_tr person_pedestrian_1_3456_tr" vType="bicycle" > > > speedFactor="1.00" > > > vaporized=""/> > > > > > > where I can see that the triggered vehicle has departDelay="18002.00". > > > Given that the person needed it at depart="18002.00", and you can see > that > > > the > > > vehicle is departing at depart="18002.00", shouldn't be the departure > > > delay 0? > > > > > > Is this intended? Am I doing something wrong? > > > I'm asking because this is messing up the computation of all my delays. > > > > > > I'm using Debian Unstable and Eclipse SUMO Version 950502e87e. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Lara > > > > > > -- > > > Lara CODECA > > > Postdoc > > > Tel : 04.93.00.81.51 > > > > > > EURECOM > > > Campus SophiaTech > > > http://www.eurecom.fr/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > sumo-user mailing list > > > sumo-user@eclipse.org > > > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > > > from this list, visit > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > > > > > > -- > Lara CODECA > Postdoc > Tel : 04.93.00.81.51 > > EURECOM > Campus SophiaTech > http://www.eurecom.fr/ > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
