There is also a known issue where bidirectional deadlock may occur under specific circumstances (https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/7078). If you can provide a small error scenario I can take a look.
Am Mi., 29. Juli 2020 um 09:27 Uhr schrieb Harald Schaefer < [email protected]>: > Hi Joshua, > > you can start sumo with the option --railsignal-block-output FILE. > > This gives you a list showing the extend of driveways (the railroader > would say routes) starting at this signal and their protection requirements > (e.g. flank protection). > > The signal goes to red, if other trains are on the required edges/lanes. > > Here is an example for signal s22 from > tests/sumo/rail/tramwayLoop/net.net.xml > > <railSignal id="s22"> > <link linkIndex="0" from="T25_0_0" to=":s22_0_0"> > <driveWay edges="T26_0 T44_0 T36_0 T37_0 Tdepot_0"> > <forward lanes=":s22_0_0 T26_0_0 :w4_1_0 T44_0_0 :w5_2_0 > T36_0_0 :s29_1_0 T37_0_0 :w9_4_0 Tdepot_0_0"/> > <bidi lanes="T44_1_0 :w5_1_0 T36_1_0 :s29_0_0 T37_1_0 > :w9_3_0 Tdepot_1_0"/> > <flank lanes=":w4_2_0 T41_0_0 :w9_1_0 :w5_0_0 T27_1_0 > :s23_0_0 T28_1_0 :w9_0_0"/> > <conflictLinks signals=""/> > </driveWay> > <driveWay edges="T26_0 T44_0 T27_0 T28_0"> > <forward lanes=":s22_0_0 T26_0_0 :w4_1_0 T44_0_0 :w5_3_0 > T27_0_0"/> > <bidi lanes="T44_1_0 :w5_0_0 T27_1_0 :s23_0_0 T28_1_0"/> > <flank lanes=":w4_2_0 T41_0_0 :w5_1_0 T36_1_0 :s29_0_0"/> > <conflictLinks signals="s29_0"/> > </driveWay> > </link> > </railSignal> > > Might be analyzing this file helps you to find the issue. > > You can than try to add more signals or flank protection switches in your > network. > > Regards Harald > Am 28.07.20 um 22:26 schrieb Harald Schaefer: > > Hi Joshua, > > can you provide a small example? > > In the rail signal implementation is some logic to prevent collisions. > > Regards, Harald > Am 28.07.20 um 22:01 schrieb Issa, Joshua: > > Hello, > > > > I am wondering about how to modify rail signal behaviour. Currently, I am > running a bi-directional rail simulation, but on occasion the rail signals > will essentially shut down and not let any trains pass. > > Specifically, in a junction like this, there will be occasion when two out > of three lanes are occupied, but the third is not an option to travel to. > > > > How would I modify this behaviour? > > > > Thank you. > > > > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
