Hi Harald, Thank you for pointing that out. But how would I fix it, since the xml-files are created and read by sumo.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 2:09 PM Harald Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > there seems to be memory leaks in the context of reading of xml-files. > > I have run the scenario twice with a simulation time of 5 resp. 10 seconds: > > The output of valgrind (a memory checker under linux) shows an increasing > number of lost bytes: > > valgrind28244.log (5 sceonds) > ==28244== LEAK SUMMARY: > ==28244== definitely lost: 19,592 bytes in 202 blocks > ==28244== indirectly lost: 161,667 bytes in 1,437 blocks > ==28244== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==28244== still reachable: 48 bytes in 1 blocks > ==28244== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==28244== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not > shown. > ==28244== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all > ==28244== > ==28244== ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) > > valgrind28615.log (10 seconds) > ==28615== LEAK SUMMARY: > ==28615== definitely lost: 38,792 bytes in 402 blocks > ==28615== indirectly lost: 257,667 bytes in 2,437 blocks > ==28615== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==28615== still reachable: 48 bytes in 1 blocks > ==28615== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==28615== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not > shown. > ==28615== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all > ==28615== > ==28615== ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) > > Attached is the modified py script and the output of valgrind for the last > run > > Greetings, Harald > > > Am 30.03.21 um 19:55 schrieb . Abdullah: > > Hi, > > I have attached both the .py and .txt files below. > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:50 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Abdullah, >> >> >> >> I cannot see your .py file. Would you please send it as a .txt file? >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Giuliana >> >> >> >> *Von:* sumo-user <[email protected]> *Im Auftrag von *. >> Abdullah >> *Gesendet:* Montag, 29. März 2021 16:50 >> *An:* Sumo project User discussions <[email protected]> >> *Betreff:* [sumo-user] Using traci.simulation.loadState increases memory >> usage >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I have noticed that if I use traci.simulation.loadState multiple times >> then my memory usage increases significantly. I have attached a simple code >> below, where cars are being added to the network and after every 5 seconds, >> a state is being saved and loaded back up. If I do this multiple times, it >> increases my memory usage. You can try the same code again by commenting >> out line 47 and it will drastically reduce the memory usage. Is there >> something I am doing wrong and is there a way around this? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thank you. >> >> Abdullah >> _______________________________________________ >> sumo-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > > > -- > Thank you. > Abdullah > > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > -- Thank you. Abdullah
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
