The proposed steps are all reasonable (for step 4, setting a value close to 1 should have the desired affect whereas values close to 0 should have less effect). The side-effect of step 3 in making the GEH worse (when not running any optimization) is also expected. Can you give some example inputs where the results strongly deviate from your expectation?
regards, Jakob Am Do., 2. Feb. 2023 um 15:21 Uhr schrieb PRAPUL POONACHA < prapulpoona...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > I am generating a scenario with the help of route sampler tool. The count > data and a set of route files are the inputs for the route sampler tool. > The amount of mismatch between the count data and the results obtained by > the route sampler is less. However the number of vehicles generated is very > high and unrealistic. > Based on my understanding, I considered that the following steps should > decrease the number of vehicles. > 1. Improve the route file which is being provided as an input to the route > sampler > 2. Use the --min-count with a higher value to cause vehicles to visit more > detector locations > 3. Use the --total-count option to set a hard constraint on the total > number of vehicles. (This however decreases the GEH values drastically). > 4. Use the --minimize-vehicles > > Does the approach make sense or is there a flaw in it? > > The last option '--minimize-vehicles' when used with --optimization option > doesn't seem to have any effect on the output. Do you have any idea why > this could be happening? > > Thanks and regards, > Prapul > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
