Hi Chritra,
how does your network look like (especially around the E3 detectors) and
what numbers are we talking about (40% of which vehicle volume)? As I don't
know your scenario I see these options:
* the vehicle volume is very low even at 80% of the reference volume
or...
* the volume is very high such that not much more than 40% of the
reference vehicle volume can be inserted in the network( due to the
number of insertion lanes and the configured follower distance /
car-following model settings)
* all cars use the same car-following model settings (=keep the same
distance) and have the right-of-way along the E3 detector lanes (no
need to brake)
Did you actually watch the vehicles in sumo-gui?
Best regards
Mirko
-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: [sumo-user] Unexpected delay results
Datum: 2024-02-14T08:30:00+0100
Von: "Chithra Saikrishna via sumo-user" <[email protected]>
An: "Sumo project User discussions" <[email protected]>
Hello,
While analysing the MeanTimeLoss values from E3 detectors in SUMO for
different traffic conditions (varying volume), I have obtained results
where even though the input volume is increasing from 40% to 80%, the
average vehicular delay is not varying significantly as that of volume. The
average delay is concentrated over a very short range ( 43 s/veh to 45
s/veh).
Is there any possible reason for this unexpected results from SUMO?
Thanking you in advance.
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
