Dear Alexander,
thank you very much for the patch. It has been integrated in revision
[19859].

regards,
Jakob

2016-01-30 21:49 GMT+01:00 Alexander Weidinger <[email protected]>:

> Hi Michael and Jakob,
>
> I was able to find a/the solution for the problem.
> In nearly every set-method, the command is transmitted,
> but the packet returning is not checked
> and therefore stays in the buffer.
> Still the nextStep function call checks for incoming packets
> and receives the false one from the buffer,
> leading to the error mesage.
>
> I attached a *.patch file containing a patch for all predefined methods
> and extended the library for a few vehicle set/get methods.
>
> You can ignore the hardcoded 'config.h' path.
> I need it for a project where a 'config.h' file already exists.
>
> regards,
> Alexander
>
>
> On 01/04/2016 09:28 AM, Jakob Erdmann wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> > this is the same type of error you already reported in November.
> > Apparently it concerns many more commands.
> > It is now being tracked at http://sumo.dlr.de/trac.wsgi/ticket/2007
> > regards,
> > Jakob
> >
> > 2015-12-21 18:11 GMT+01:00 Michael Behrisch
> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
> >>:
> >
> >     Hi Alexander,
> >     this error should not appear and since it seems rather severe, I
> assume,
> >     it has to do with our setup. Could you please give some more details
> >     concerning your platform (Windows/Linux, which python version etc.)
> and
> >     the sumo version you use?
> >     Maybe you can also send the whole scenario or at least the complete
> >     script?
> >
> >     Best regards,
> >     Michael
> >
> >     Am 21.12.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Alexander Weidinger:
> >     > Hi,
> >     >
> >     > try {
> >     >     tracictrl->vehicle.setSpeed("veh0", car->_speed_x);
> >     >     tracictrl->simulationStep(0);
> >     > } catch(tcpip::SocketException &e) {
> >     >     debug("tcpip: %s\n", e.what());
> >     > }
> >     >
> >     > leads to:
> >     >
> >     > tcpip: #Error: received status response to command: 196 but
> expected: 2
> >     >
> >     > This also happens for methods, which were already implemented and
> not
> >     > extended by myself.
> >     > Seems like the order of packet handling isn't done correctly in
> traci
> >     >
> >     > Any ideas on how to fix this?
> >     >
> >     > Best regards,
> >     > Alexander
> >     >
> >     >
> >
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > sumo-user mailing list
> >     > [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     sumo-user mailing list
> >     [email protected] <mailto:
> [email protected]>
> >     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> Alexander Weidinger
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user

Reply via email to