Hi again,

Yes, with the extra months now available, I get a very different result. Using only April was a lucky hit, I guess. Using April to December with the same method as before, I get:

Altitude of sun at sunset : latitude
 0.00 : 47.05
-0.26 : 46.96
-0.83 : 46.71

Dan, the December day length and night length do not add to 24 hours. Is that really so in the source document?

Cheers,
Steve




On 2019-08-09 1:25 p.m., Dan-George Uza wrote:
Hello again,

Here is the complete data with the exception of the first three months which have been lost:

April 1793 - sunrise: 5:20 and sunset: 07:14
                 - day length - 13 hours and 20 minutes, night - 10 hours and 40 minutes

May 1793 - sunrise: 4:33 and sunset: 07:47
                 - day length - 14 hours and 54 minutes, night - 9 hours and 6 minutes

June 1793 - sunrise: 4:05 and sunset: 07:47
                 - day length - 14 hours and 53 minutes, night - 9 hours and 7 minutes

July 1793 - sunrise: 4:12 and sunset: 07:44
                 - day length - 15 hours and 36 minutes, night - 8 hours and 24 minutes

August 1793 - sunrise: 4:51 and sunset: 06:39
                 - day length - 14 hours and 18 minutes, night - 9 hours and 42 minutes

September 1793 - sunrise: 5:41 and sunset: 05:29
                 - day length - 12 hours and 38 minutes, night -11 hours and 22 minutes

October 1793 - sunrise: 6:24 and sunset: 05:20
                 - day length - 10 hours and 52 minutes, night - 13 hours and 8 minutes

November 1793 - sunrise: 7:24 and sunset: 04:21
                 - day length - 9 hours and 12 minutes, night - 14 hours and 38 minutes

December 1793 - sunrise: 7:54 pm and sunset: 4:05 pm
                 - day length - 8 hours and 12 minutes, night - 8 hours and 48 minutes


Dan Uza

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:50 PM Dan-George Uza <cerculdest...@gmail.com <mailto:cerculdest...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Dear Steve,

    I will share the data for the whole year once I get it (I only
    have April). Your preliminary results sound too good to be true.
    I did a simulation using TimeAndDate.com for three completely
    different locations on the European continent: Constanta
    (Romania), Gorlitz (Germany) and London (UK). I chose these
    because of their proximity to the time zone meridians, this way
    the old solar time is more easily found (I just exclude 1h
    daylight saving time).

    The stated duration of the day of 13h20min for April is recorded
    in those localities on April 13, April 7, respectively April 7
    (all gregorian, the last two cities have approximately the same
    latitude).
    Sunrise on these respective dates (in solar time): 5:24 in
    Constanta, 5:23 in Gorlitz, 5:23 in London.
    Sunset (in solar time): 18:47 at Constanta, 18:42 at Gorlitz,
    18:43 at London.

    In the calendar we've got sunrise at 5:20, which is a good enough
    fit for all the above examples.
    On the other hand, sunset is at 7:14 (p.m.) and this time doesn't
    fit any of the examples above.
    If we consider it to be the civil twilight, we have 19:16 for
    Constanta, 19:16 for Gorlitz, respectively 19:17 for London (old
    hours). These correspond quite well with the sunset given by the
    calendar.

    Dan Uza

    On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:15 PM Steve Lelievre
    <steve.lelievre.can...@gmail.com
    <mailto:steve.lelievre.can...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        Dan,

        Using only your April data, and assuming:

        1. day length is the difference of the sunset and sunrise (as
        opposed to the daylength stated),
        2. sunrise and sunset are when the center of the sun is on the
        horizon
        3. my modern source of solar declination data is "good enough"
        4. your table of values is for the Julian calendar, which for
        the year in question is offset from the Gregorian calendar by
        11 days,

        then, by varying latitude to minimize the Sum of Squares of
        the differences between true day lengths and the
        representative day length stated .... I get a latitude of
        44.413N, which would correspond to Bucarest.

        If I could use your table of data for the full year, the
        result would of course be different - better, I would hope,
        but possibly not!

        As yet, I have no idea why the stated day length is not the
        same as the difference of the sunrise and sunset.

        Steve


        On 2019-08-09 1:06 a.m., Dan-George Uza wrote:
        Hello all,

        I have seen an old calendar from 1793 which lists for every
        month sunrise and sunset times as well as day and night
        duration. For example, taking the month of April: sunrise at
        5 h 20 m, sunset at 7 h 14 m; day length 13 h 20 min, night
        length 10 h 40 m.

        Somebody asked me if it would be possible to establish the
        approximate geographical area for these predictions.

        I'm pretty sure it's not possible. Back then they used true
        solar time (or perhaps mean solar time?) so I guess these
        hours would have been valid for a whole parallel of latitude,
        with variations once you go north or south.

        Nevertheless, I made a simulation and realized that I cannot
        get close to these numbers. I don't know why. Perhaps because
        back then sunrise and sunset was not counted by solar limb,
        but by geometric center of the Sun? How did they do it?

        Regards,

-- Dan-George Uza

        ---------------------------------------------------
        https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial


        ---------------------------------------------------
        https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



-- Dan-George Uza



--
Dan-George Uza


---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to