To find some authority for the understanding that the Italian hours begin at 
the end of dusk, or about half an hour after sunset, I note that in the BBS 
Sundial Glossary under “hour plane” - “Italian” it says -


“there is some evidence in older works that Italian hours were counted from 30 
minutes after sunset.”

http://sundialsoc.org.uk/discussions/glossary-a-z/8/


Does anyone know what this evidence in older works is?


A few other places I've looked -


Wikipedia says “end of dusk, i.e. half an hour after sunset.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hour


This looked promising - Mario Arnaldi, Le ore italiane. Origine e declino di 
uno dei più importanti sistemi orari del passato (prima parte).

https://www.academia.edu/2021250/Le_ore_italiane._Origine_e_declino_di_uno_dei_piu_importanti_sistemi_orari_del_passato_prima_parte_


But he does not mention the notion of "a half hour after" (mezz'ora dopo) 
sunset  (tramonto del sole).


Ross Caldwell
43.349399 3.22422981
Béziers, France


________________________________
De : sundial <sundial-boun...@uni-koeln.de> de la part de Ross Sinclair 
Caldwell <belmu...@hotmail.com>
Envoyé : mercredi 1 juillet 2020 16:41
À : John Davis <john.davi...@btopenworld.com>; Schechner, Sara 
<sche...@fas.harvard.edu>
Cc : 'sundial list sundials' <sundial@uni-koeln.de>
Objet : RE: Time problem

Hi John, Sara et al.,
My understanding is that a seasonal (or unequal) hour is a period of time ('in 
the first hour' etc) and not an instant. It is never divided up into minutes 
and so the time of 6 minutes after dawn must be referring to a time in equal 
hours, most probably measured with an astrolabe as you suggest.
I agree. All that remains unknowable is the visibilty at the time. If it were 
overcast at dawn, they must have calculated rather than observed. But I tend to 
think it was observed, and determined with an astrolabe.

Ross
________________________________
De : John Davis <john.davi...@btopenworld.com>
Envoyé : mercredi 1 juillet 2020 10:10
À : Ross Sinclair Caldwell <belmu...@hotmail.com>; Schechner, Sara 
<sche...@fas.harvard.edu>
Cc : 'sundial list sundials' <sundial@uni-koeln.de>
Objet : RE: Time problem

Hi Sara, Ross et al,


My understanding is that a seasonal (or unequal) hour is a period of time ('in 
the first hour' etc) and not an instant. It is never divided up into minutes 
and so the time of 6 minutes after dawn must be referring to a time in equal 
hours, most probably measured with an astrolabe as you suggest.


Regards,


John

-----------------------



------ Original Message ------
From: "Schechner, Sara" <sche...@fas.harvard.edu>
To: "Ross Sinclair Caldwell" <belmu...@hotmail.com>
Cc: "'sundial list sundials'" <sundial@uni-koeln.de>
Sent: Tuesday, 30 Jun, 20 At 21:20
Subject: RE: Time problem


>>> In short, I am researching the biography of Filippo Maria Visconti 
>>> (1392-1447), duke of Milan, and you probably know that these Italian 
>>> princes relied heavily on astrology. So, Visconti's time of birth is known 
>>> precisely - "six minutes after sunrise," Monday, 23 September, 1392. His 
>>> natal chart was of course produced and interpreted, but it has been lost. I 
>>> am trying to recreate it as it might have been done by a court astrologer 
>>> of the time.<<<

I have some thoughts about ascertaining the time of “6 minutes after sunrise” 
in 1392 in Milan.

First of all, Milan is one of the earliest towns to have a public tower clock 
in the 14th century, but it would only strike and show hours according to local 
solar time. It would not be divided into minutes. It was not reliable enough 
for such a horological chart.

Sundials would be the more commonly used timepiece, but the six-minutes is an 
unusual amount of precision. My guess is that the court astronomer was using an 
astrolabe, which can be divided into units in the range of 4-6 minutes. Many 
also had arcs for the astrological houses and for both equal and unequal hours. 
The actual time might have been taken from a bright star still visible in the 
dawn.

It is also worth considering what this 6-minutes after dawn really means. Is 
the astrologer using unequal hours which were still more common in these early 
days of clocks? If so, then six minutes would be equal to 1/10 of the first 
hour on that day of the year—i.e., 1/10 of 1/12 of the length of daylight.

Lastly, in reconstructing a horoscope, one needs to know the position of the 
planets to place them on the chart. Some might be observed, but mostly they are 
taken from a table. These varied in different manuscript traditions. Do we have 
a clue what table the astrologer was using?

Good luck with your project.

Sara

Sara J. Schechner, Ph.D.

David P. Wheatland Curator of the Collection of Historical Scientific 
Instruments

Lecturer on the History of Science

Department of the History of Science, Harvard University

Science Center 251c, 1 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138

Tel: 617-496-9542 | Fax: 617-495-3344

sche...@fas.harvard.edu<mailto:sche...@fas.harvard.edu> | @SaraSchechner

http://scholar.harvard.edu/saraschechner

http://chsi.harvard.edu/

________________________________
---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Dr J Davis
Flowton Dials http://www.flowton-dials.co.uk/
BSS Editor 
http://sundialsoc.org.uk/publications/the-bss-bulletin/<http://www.sundialsoc.org.uk/bulletin.php>

---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to