Thanks On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 12:03 -0700, Aly Dharshi wrote: > If you are going to adopt a RHEL edition solution try out RHEL3 instead, I > believe that its still a 2.4 kernel base and it should work right out of the > box. Plus also look at XFCE as a lightweight and yet CDE like desktop. You > should have in my opinion better success with a RedHat solution. >
In mailing list, I read SRSS 3 work with 2.6 kernel, so I think SRSS can be run on RHEL 4 (I am not sure), SRSS 3 have many dependence Kernel version and some library version? and for window manager, I think I doesn't use window manager. I just make new session in gdm, and that new session just running only rdesktop now. People who want to use SBC solution doesn't interest about UNIX desktop environment, they more want to see MS windows desktop environment like there existing. Thanks Kitae > ASD. > > Jim Gottlieb wrote: > > On 2005-03-22 at 11:57, Kitae Kim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > >>At first we test x86 SRSS 3 in JDS, I think JDS is too havey and too > >>slow so I will try to change test system to Redahat EL4. > > > > > > I agree that JDS may be too piggy for use on Sun Rays, but you don't > > have to switch to Red Hat to use a different windowing system. > > > > For example, we use fvwm (under Solaris) on our Sun Rays because it is > > quite lightweight in comparison to CDE or GNOME. > > _______________________________________________ > > SunRay-Users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users > _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
