Thank you Craig and Wim for taking the time to follow up with this. I missed the post from Wim on the other thread but it looks promising.
It is refreshing to have a forum to discuss issues and provide feedback where somebody listens. If only there was a similar way to get through to Adobe. - Murray On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Craig Bender <craig.ben...@oracle.com> wrote: > I wouldn't say that Oracle isn't interested in this problem, we indeed our. > As the Exec VP in charge of Sun Ray Wim Coekaerts wrote in a message to > this very group regarding libflashsupport "we'll get it fixed one way or the > other tho." > > > > John Francis wrote: >> >> Looks like neither Adobe nor Oracle are really interested in this >> problem. I think SRSS is mainly deployed in VDI or simple uttsc >> scenarios and so desktop Linux is the least of Oracle's concern. I >> know it is not a bug on their side, but looking at the bug reports >> they don't even seem to be asking Adobe to address the issue. >> >> It is a shame because managing just two or three Linux desktop session >> servers for a couple of hundred users is far more efficient and easier >> than any of the full blown VDI solutions I've looked at. >> >> As for Adobe, it's odd that they fixed it in the 9 series. It was a >> problem initially, it was reported and subsequently fixed. If it was >> worth fixing in the 9 series, why is it not worth giving any attention >> to in version 10? They must have fixed it in 9 after the branch was >> made for the version 10 code-base, or maybe 10 started with a clean >> code-base. >> >> On 6 July 2010 08:58, Murray Fraser <msfra...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Has there been any response from Adobe? >>> >>> I seem to be getting more and more reports of sites requiring an up to >>> date version of flash player, as I'm still running the v9.0 release. >>> >>> - Murray >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Wim Coekaerts >>> <wim.coekae...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> We will contact adobe again. I saw the bug you filed. >>>> http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-3929 >>>> >>>> if I get info ll post it to the list. >>>> >>>> Wim >>>> >>>> On 06/10/2010 04:20 PM, Murray Fraser wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Since Adobe havn't able to fix the color masks for flash player 10.1, >>>>> how much trouble would it be for it to be changed on the Sun Ray X >>>>> server, so that it uses the 'red, green, blue = 0xff0000, 0xff00 0xff' >>>>> colour masks that Adobe assumes. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps this could be an option for utxconfig. >>>>> >>>>> - Murray >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> SunRay-Users mailing list >>>>> SunRay-Users@filibeto.org >>>>> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users >>>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SunRay-Users mailing list >>> SunRay-Users@filibeto.org >>> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users >>> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
