Thanks Craig,
Yeah, it sure was not promoted... 

I did also find reference to 2-way audio on the Think Thin blog (looking 
for something else).  Duh!  Should know by now to check there too. 

This is an important capability for us.  Disappointing to hear it is 
limited to SPARC, which most of our customers are not using (they are 
mostly X86).  Look forward to the rest shortly, I hope.  Will SRSS on 
Linux also be covered? 

-- Peter






Craig Bender <craig.ben...@oracle.com>
Sent by: sunray-users-boun...@filibeto.org
2010.09.16 19:03
Please respond to SunRay-Users mailing list
 
        To:     SunRay-Users mailing list <sunray-users@filibeto.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [SunRay-Users] SRS 5 patches and Window 2-way 
audio support?


Hi Peter (and others)

We indeed did release upstream support for Windows XP with the last 
patch release.  However, we did a poor job with out test cases and wound 
up with some issues.  End result is that the only reliable setup was 
Solaris SPARC for SRSS and any Sun Ray besides a 3+.  Thus we didn't 
tout the feature like you'd expect, but it's listed on the what's new 
page of SRWC 2.2.

A new patch is imminent and should appear on Sunsolve shortly to resolve 
the issues. The components that need patching however are on the SRSS 
side of the equation, so feel free to get ready by updating the Sun Ray 
Windows Connector Tools on your windows images.

It is true that RDP 5.2 lacks native support for upstream, this solution 
is specific for XP and Sun Ray.


On 9/16/10 1:56 PM, peter_blatherw...@mitel.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I heard a rumor (from Oracle/Sun PM to one of ours to me) that SRS 5
> patches released in July added upstream support for Windows XP and 2003.
> Claimed Windows 7 support coming, but not there yet. I can see no clue
> that it would be the case in any of the patch readmes.
> (http://wikis.sun.com/display/SRS/Home#tab:Patches)
>
> Is this true? Last I heard this lack of 2-way audio to Windows /WTS was
> due to lack of support for the upstream direction in RDP (or may it was
> Microsoft's implementation of it). If there is some truth to this I
> would sure like to check it out. (If no truth, I do not want to waste my
> time.)
>
> -- Peter
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to