Hello, I've just recently discovered that gpg signatures generated by sup are not verifiable (BAD signature result from gpg) on other e-mail clients (tried with mutt and claws-mail), when I have nonempty signature. With no signature present, all works fine. Sup can verify the signature succesfully in either case though. (I'm using sup 0.5.)
I'm sorry, I'm no ruby programmer, so I don't know where the problem could be; just by common sense it would seem that ruby strips the message of the signature before dealing with gpg sig. Thanks for help, -- Jan _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
