Reformatted excerpts from William Morgan's message of 2009-04-29: > A timestamp is the obvious choice, but messages can have the same > timestamp, so then what do you do? The current approach is to sort by > another arbitrary field (in this cae, message size), which gives a > unique ordering, but doesn't match up
Sigh. Doesn't match up with that procmail, or whatever MUA, is giving us. -- William <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
