Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Sun Aug 16 17:44:49 -0400 2009: > Reformatted excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2009-08-11: > > It's worth noting that update_message_state needs to handle modified > > refs and snippets as well as labels. Maybe add a comment about this in > > BaseIndex? > > Different snippet, definitely. Good point. Modified refs: I'm tempted to > replace this with another API call, since we don't really care about the > refs; we just want the index to thread the messages together. Thoughts?
The ThreadSet still needs the ref to do the UI-level threading, right? Making it another API call is good as long as that's still taken care of. _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
