Reformatted excerpts from Israel Herraiz's message of 2009-09-01:
> Yes, although list-id is not an address (it does not contain the "@"
> symbol for instance). But I am happy with that patch :-).

Actually you're right. I think I prefer your patch. But based on the
code, it seems like reply-mode would crash if it got a message that
claims it's a list message but doesn't have a list address. Does it
actually work?
-- 
William <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

Reply via email to