Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Thu Sep 03 12:06:55 -0600 2009: > Reformatted excerpts from Carl Worth's message of 2009-08-26: > > These behave identically to the existing ",a" and ",d" commands, (that > > is they archive or delete the current thread and then view the next). > > Sorry it's taken me so long to look at this. Thanks for the patch! > > I'm curious what other people think about this. On the one hand, it's > only additional keybindings, so it's not going to adversely affect > anyone. On the other hand, there is a nice balance with the ".", "," > and "]" commands which this disrupts, and it can't be extended to the > other commands from thread-index-mode. And on the third hand, I'm happy > to have keybinding hooks. > > I guess if most people primarily closes their thread-view-modes using > ",a" and ",d", then I'm fine with this.
Don't mind having 'a' and 'd' around, but likely won't use them. Generally I pass down index with &, A, S, etc. occaisionally reading high priority thread, then ]n, ]a etc. back up in thread view. -- wmw _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
