Reformatted excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of 2009-11-01: > Have strong points against Ditz or this is also a lake of energy?
Both, really. Ditz was an experiment, and after using it for a while I decided it was more trouble than it was worth. I also realized that I *did* want a centralized web site after all, and not necessarily a complicated distributed thing, both because I want non-technical users to be able to submit bug reports, and because development, in reality, *is* centralized. (I had been doing some work on Sheila, which would've provided a web frontent that people could use to submit bug reports, but even that wouldn't be quite what I wanted.) Having thought about it for a while, I think what I *really* want for Sup is something that tracks bugs/feature requests at the feature branch level (i.e. assumes that each feature branch provides a new feature or a bugfix), has a web interface for non-technical users to submit bug reports and for developers to browse/modify state on bugs, and which uses email for discussion, like I did with Whisper. (And I would be fine with it being git-specific.) I am now spending all my energy trying to keep myself from building such a thing. -- William <wmorgan-...@masanjin.net> _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
