Reformatted excerpts from Ian Smith's message of 2010-04-11: > In particular, I can sign (I've been testing mostly with signatures, > not encryption) using GPG, and send a message successfully; however, > while sup verifies that it thinks the signature is good, hushmail > doesn't recognize the message as having a signature (it sees > signature.asc as an attachment, but doesn't read the message as being > signed), and correspondents tell me that Enigmail flags my message as > having a bad signature.
I would compare the output of sup, hushmail and enigmail on a similar message, and see if there's anything obviously different in the MIME structure. It's possible Sup is emitting something they don't like. -- William <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
